|
Printable Version (.doc file)
MGMT 341-071: Organizational Behavior and Interpersonal Skills Course Objectives
The objectives of the course are to develop your knowledge and skills in the application of behavioral science concepts and principles to
individual, group and organizational level issues in organizations, particularly business organizations. These behavioral science concepts and principles form the field of Organizational Behavior.
Course Orientation Organizational Behavior builds on concepts and principles of several disciplines, primarily psychology, sociology and social psychology, and new concepts and principles are introduced in this
course. These are important foundations for understanding the behavior of individuals and groups in organizations. The orientation in this course, however, is on the applied and practical: how you can
use these concepts and principles to manage better. This has two important implications: (1) you must understand fully the conceptual material so that you can apply it to situations (understanding and good
application are inseparable) and (2) you must be an active participant in the class activities designed to build your behavioral and interpersonal skills necessary for effective management.
Course Text and Materials Text: Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities and Challenges, 3rd Edition, Debra Nelson and James Quick, South-Western College Publishing, 2000.
Supplemental material: cases, articles, and exercises as supplied by instructor Course Requirements and Performance Evaluations Performance evaluations will be based on the following requirements:
1. Class Contribution
(25% of course grade): This is the single largest component of your performance evaluation. In order to make the class more stimulating and interesting for you and for me, a good deal of in-class activity will take place: discussions, group exercises, short individual presentations, simulations, role plays, case analyses, brief group presentations, and the like. You are expected to be an
active contributing participant in these activities. What this means is:
- Class attendance is expected. It is not rewarded, per se, but is necessary for you to make a contribution. Some very few absences are to be expected but this will not help your class
contribution and excessive absences will, of course, be penalized. Keep in mind that missing one evening means you're missing an entire week of class (7% of the semester).
- Reading the assigned material prior to class is required. You cannot participate meaningfully without preparation (and lack of preparation will show). It is important that you know the
material. Simply skimming or reading superficially is inadequate for making contributions in class.
- Intelligent participation in class discussion is required. Much of the focus of this course is on interpersonal communication skills -- and I want you to exercise those skills. Students who
consistently make insightful comments about the material, demonstrate true understanding of course concepts and their applications, give us relevant work-related examples, raise interesting relevant
discussion points, and generally add to our learning will be evaluated quite highly. Non-participants, those who demonstrate a lack of preparation, and those who simply take up "air time" will be
evaluated poorly.
- Engaging in a dialogue with other students is required. The discussions in class should not be one-directional: teacher asks, students reply. Each of you must increase your ability to hold
an informed
dialogue with your peers on business issues. This class is a good place to start. To facilitate these exchanges, I will occasionally structure some "point-counterpoint shootouts" which will have students or teams argue opposite positions on an issue. I will also expect student-to-student dialogue as a normal part of the exchange of ideas during classroom discussions. What is required is that you express logical, thoughtful,
material-based ideas, not ill-thought-out or irrational personal opinions, no matter how strongly held.
- Your contribution to group activities is important and will be evaluated by me and by the other group members. You will be assigned to a work team for the duration of the course. The team often
will work in-class on activities and will produce a team case analysis and make a brief presentation on your analysis and recommendations at the end of the semester. As in GBA 300, fellow team members
will assess your contribution to the team.
My evaluation of your performance in these areas will be based on two sources: (1) my assessment of what you have contributed to the class and (2)
your team members' evaluations of your contribution to the team activities. At mid-semester, I will share with each of you my assessment of your performance to date. This gives you ample opportunity to
improve, if necessary. Clearly, this is an imperfect process, but probably not much more imperfect than other forms of performance appraisal used in business. In fact, multiple and peer sources are
commonly used in performance appraisals in many leading companies (often called "360-degree appraisals"). I am systematic in recording my judgments of your class contribution soon after each class session.
2. Two Individual Mini-case Analyses
(5% and 10%, respectively, of course grade): Analysis is the foundation of successful managerial action. Mini-cases will be assigned at two points in the semester. They will be designed to allow you to synthesize material we are covering in the course, analyze a real-world situation using course concepts, and suggest logically-derived managerial actions to address the issues in the case. Requirements for the write-ups of the case analysis will be provided and discussed early in the course. This first mini-case counts less since it is an opportunity to hone your case analysis skills.
3. Group Case Analysis
(20% of course grade): Your work team also will be assigned a case to analyze and write up. The case will be assigned early in the semester so that you can apply insights gained as we go through the course material. The team case is a vehicle for you to grapple with appropriate team roles and processes that enable you to produce a high-quality outcome from the talents of many people and to create shared accountability for the group's effort -- both characteristic of group assignments in the business world. A brief team presentation of the analysis and recommendations is required.
4. Midterm and Final Exam
(each 10% of course grade): The exams are intended to test your knowledge of the concepts from the readings and lectures as well as your ability to apply these concepts to real organizational issues. The exams will consist of short essays and analysis of "mini cases."
5. Writing Assignments/Reading Quizzes
(10% of course grade): It is imperative that you read for comprehension the assigned material prior to class. Periodically, there will be short quizzes or writing assignments focused on the material to be read for a particular class period. Some writing assignments will be assigned to do prior to coming to class; some will be done in class. In-class quizzes and in-class writing assignments will be unannounced beforehand.
6. Formal Oral Presentation
(10% of course grade): Each student is responsible for a brief (5-10 minute) formal presentation on a topic related to the substance of the course. Students will (1) select a contemporary topic in organizational behavior from the popular and academic business literature, (2) tie the material to the text and two other reference sources, and (3) present a summary and analysis of the topic to the class. Students also will be responsible for, and evaluated on, getting the class involved in some form of participation related to the presentation topic. Details of the assignment, the schedule of presentations and evaluation criteria will be discussed early in class.
Writing and Fatal Error PolicyFormal written work in this course is expected to conform
to professional business standards. In-class opportunities for peer review of your cases will be provided. I will be happy to read and give you feedback on any drafts of team or individual cases if you
provide them to me at least two weeks before the cases are due. As business students, you must practice professional standards of writing. To this end, all written assignments done out of class must meet
minimal standards to be acceptable. These are minimal standards and address such things as spelling, punctuation, format and basic grammar. Mistakes of this sort make readers question your basic competence
and have negative consequences for career advancement. The following "fatal error policy" will be used in this course. The term fatal errors
refers to technical errors in language and errors of form. Specifically, fatal errors include the following:
1) Misspelled words 2) Sentence fragments 3) Run-on sentences and comma splices 4) Mistakes in capitalization 5) Errors in punctuation
6) Errors in verb tense or subject/verb agreement 7) Improper citation/references 8) Lack of consistency in format
One way of avoiding some of these errors is to pay careful attention to what you write. Another way is to use spelling and grammar software (available in our computer and writing labs); these programs will
detect some kinds of fatal errors, but not others. Another way is to make sure you have someone else help proof your document (your team members can help here). Another way is to write a draft then edit it
into a final product well before it is due; this allows you to do a careful final check. Another way is to take advantage of the assistance available in the Writing Lab. In the end, you
are responsible for producing a document that meets acceptable standards of writing. These minimal standards are quite reasonable for university-level work. Cases or writing assignments with more than
three fatal errors on any one page or ten or more in the entire document are unacceptable and will result in a failing grade on the assignment. Communicating with others is one of the critical
components of managerial effectiveness. I am convinced that it is even more important to your career success than are intellectual development, hard work, or technical knowledge. Let's take it seriously in
this class. Tentative Course Outline (subject to change as we monitor our progress)
Date |
Topics/Activities |
Readings |
8/21 |
Course Introduction and Expectations
Course model, logistics, introductory framework Exercise: My Worse Boss Exercise: Competitive Challenges for Managers Extemporaneous writing assignment (in-class) |
Ch. 1,2 |
8/28 |
Personality, Perception, Attitudes and Values
Exercise: identifying common perceptual distortions Exercise: Alligator River Story Case discussion: Lora Grey |
Ch 3, 4 |
9/4 |
Labor Day Holiday – No Classes (Catch up on readings!!!) |
|
9/11 |
Motivation: theoretical foundations
Exercise: Generational differences in motivation |
Ch. 5 |
9/18 |
Performance and Learning: managing rewards
Case: Perfect Pizzeria Exercise: Managing pay as a motivating reward |
Ch. 6 |
9/25 |
Organizational Communication
Example: Whirlpool Communications Improvement Exercise: Communicating effectively through E-mail First Individual Written Mini-case Due |
Ch. 8 |
10/2 |
Managing Effective Groups and Work Teams: diagnosing and improving group
process Consultant's View: Taking Teams Seriously Case: BSD, Inc. Application: Improving your team's effectiveness |
Ch. 9 |
10/9 |
Decision-making in Organizations
Individual vs. group decision-making Case: BSD, Inc. Revisited Exercise: Swamped |
Ch. 10 |
10/16 |
Power, Politics and Political Behavior
Exercise: The Political Organization Exercise: Increasing your power in an organization Midterm Exam (Chs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10) |
Ch. 11 |
10/23 |
Leadership
Leadership vs. management Exercise: Leadership Style Inventory |
Ch. 12 |
10/30 |
Individual Presentations (half of the class) |
|
11/6 |
Individual Presentations (other half of the class) |
|
11/13 |
Conflict and Conflict Management
Exercise: The Ugli Orange Exercise: Negotiation Style Profile |
Ch. 13 |
11/20 |
Dimensions of Organizational Structure: work design and
organizational structureConsulting simulation: Babcock Material Handling Group Second Individual Written Mini-case Due |
Ch. 14,15 |
11/27 |
Organizational Culture
Exercise: Measuring dimensions of culture Consultant's View: Why culture change fails Cases: Nordstrom, Monsanto-AHP |
Ch. 16 |
12/4 |
Leading and Managing Organizational Change Group Written Case Due
Brief Team Case Oral Presentations Review for final exam |
Ch. 18 |
12/11 |
Final Exam (Chs. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18): Monday, 8:30-10:10 p.m. |
|
|