5 Questions
Feedback
Money goes to the department generating SCH's.
a % of SCH's to dept for 100-200 level courses
a GREATER % of SCH's to dept for 300-400 level courses
I notice that SIUC Spring 16 enrollments show a continued decline. SIUC is shrinking while SIUE is growing. Why aren't we revisiting the budget split in the system?
Strive to have a budget that relies as little as possible on state funding. Move to a private university model.
We need a mission-centric budget model. As the VC request a realignment of the pie, there should be a straight line to the mission statement. Differentiated tuition by program should be considered.
Probably, but this is a difficult question to answer because the current budget model is not clear. We appear to have a budget model whose origin is lost in the mists of time, and which gets tweaked each year. What is our current budget model and what are the other options? One thing in terms of overall budget that needs to be addressed is the division of the system budget. SIUE enrolments have been rising while SIUC enrolments have been dropping, so the two campuses appear to be converging. It may not be long before SIUE has more students than SIUC. Why are we not revisiting the proportion of the budget SIUE receives compared to SIUC?