Dave asked this: Are you
showing the revisions of your goals such that a reader can kind of
"trace your thinking" and see how your thinking about goals evolved as
you continued to work on this project?
I'm not really clear what
you mean by that. I'm not sure that how I word the goals would reflect
how I was thinking or not. So, because I said this, and I'm looking at
"Strategies for Peer Review of Course Projects" I need to look back at
the examples in reserves. On bee keeping, Benjamin wrote out his goals,
then he refined the goals by basically explaining how he saw that two or
more goals were related. Then he wrote the refined goals and ranked
them. I guess I could follow his thinking in this manner.
I
couldn't follow the thinking on the candles project. It looked like she
took some things out. It could be because I don't really know anything
about making candles because the crochet project looked like she took
things out, combined and refined. I understood her thinking, but I know
about crocheting.
So, I guess I kind of answered my own question
on clarity, but I would be very happy to read how other can clarify
this further. Now I need to go back and look at my goals to see if they
might be clear on my thinking. I would also love to read if others think
they show my line of thought, or not.
Rhonda
Parent Post