Ingolf Vogeler, Types of
International Borders
along the U.S.-Mexico Border |
Israel has a very tightly fortified
fenced and walled border with the Palestine
West Bank and Gaza Strip. In the West Bank, and especially in Jerusalem,
walled barriers restrict cross-border crossings to only a few, highly
restricted points. Indeed,
as a "democracy" Israel has created the most
militarized,
or some say, security
landscapes in
the most recent times. Soffer and Minghi (1986) claim that from 10 to 50
percent, depending on location, of this small country consists of three
elements of its militarized landscape:
1.
military land use:
airfields, army camps, training and firing ranges, military
industries, fortifications along borders, security border zones;
2.
security and defense structures:
transportation and settlement patterns, civilian defense, national
planning for dispersal settlements, economic infrastructure for
emergency situations, ruined villages; and
3.
features of past wars:
national cemeteries, monuments, old forts.
Security lands uses exceed 50 percent along the border with Lebanon, Negev peninsula, Jordan, Golan Heights, Gaza Strip, and Egypt; in the rest of Israel, the percent declines to 10 percent. All governments, of course, justify their exclusionary border actions, whether for security reasons, to control illegal immigration, illegal activities, and/or terrorism, but the results are the same for the people on the ground who seek to move for legitimate personal economic, political, or religious reasons, if no always legally defined by the countries to which they want to move. Landscape of security, however well intended by governments, are also landscapes of exclusion –- preventing people from moving freely from one country to another and/or separating members of the same ethnic groups between countries.
|