**RA
101 **Summer
2014 (Ezio Vailati)

Where to reach me: PH 2212; phone: 3376.

E-mail: evailat@siue.edu; if you email me, *identify yourself as taking this class*.

Homepage: http://www.siue.edu/~evailat .
Click on "Courses" and then on "RA 101" to find this
very syllabus.

Office Hours: M,W 10:00-11:00, and by appointment if needed.

**Course
objectives**

The objectives of this course are two: first, to develop the
ability to identify and evaluate arguments; second to apply these skills to the
analysis of some controversial topics.
Hence, the first segment of the course will be spent studying and
applying the notions of validity, strength, soundness, and cogency, and in
mastering the logic of phrases such as “only if’ and “unless.” This will be followed by the study of
informal fallacies (bad arguments that look good). Finally, we shall acquire skills for the
determination of hidden premises and facts that strengthen or weaken arguments. After learning the aforementioned skills, we
shall identify and evaluate the arguments in the majority opinion of *Roe v Wade*, the Supreme Court’s decision
that legalized abortion, and discuss the morality of the death penalty and of
assisted suicide.

**Texts
**

1.
P.J.
Hurley, *A concise introduction to Logic *11^{th}
edition (H). (Rental Text)

2.
Some
handouts and material to be downloaded from my homepage.

**Course
Outline **

6/2: Knowing
that and knowing how; the basics: arguments and their components; recognizing
arguments. Reading: H 1.1 and H 1.2. *Quiz 1*

6/4: The
basics: types of arguments and their strength. Reading: H 1.3- 1.4

6/6: Continuation
of the above; conditional statements, necessary and sufficient conditions,
using “only if,” “if and only if,” and “unless.” *Quiz 2*

6/9: Checking
the validity of some simple arguments.

6/11: Informal
fallacies. Reading: H 3.1-3.2. *Quiz
3*

6/13: Informal
fallacies. Reading: H 3.3.

6/16: Informal
fallacies. Reading: H 3.4. *Midterm*

6/18: Arguments
by analogy. Reading: H 9.1.

6/20: Logical
skills: additional facts that strengthen or weaken an argument or a
position. Reading: download;
inferences and conclusions. Reading: download.
*Quiz
4*

6/23: Logical
skills: continuation of the above; hidden assumptions. Reading: download.

6/25: Thinking
about Roe v Wade, a US Supreme Court decision: Download
Roe v. Wade *Quiz 5*

6/27: Continuation
of the above.

6/30: Thinking
and constructing arguments about controversial issues: the death penalty; suicide
and the right to die. Reading: Download. Watch *The Suicide Tourist*. Reading: Download. ** Quiz 6**.

7/2: Hidden mechanisms of thought: Watch Ariely’s lecture on irrationality in decision-making. Recap.
**Final exam**

**Course requirements and grades **

1) Class attendance.

2) Six
scheduled quizzes, some take-home and some in-class, each worth 15 points.
Their dates are given in the course outline.
*No make-up quizzes will be given
unless in extreme circumstances*.

3) A midterm exam, worth 45 points.

4)
Participation in the discussion of
the topics covered from 6/25 onward.
This will be worth 10 points. You
start with 5 points; good participation will produce more points; lack of
participation will lose them.

5) A
comprehensive final exam worth 55 points.

There are 200 possible points in this class. The correspondence between points and course grades is as follows: 200-180: A; 179-158: B; 157-136: C; 135-115: D; below 115: F. There may be a minimal curving of grades.

An A indicates excellence; a B
overall competency; a C competency in some areas and poor command in others, or
low competence overall; a D a minimally acceptable overall competence; finally,
an F indicates an unacceptable level of competence.

**Calculating grades**

I do not keep a running count of grades because I use points. However, since points eventually turn into grades according to the above scale, here’s how to calculate your letter grade. Let S be the sum of all the possible points up to a point in the course; let M be the total points you have; calculate P = (200 * M)/S; use P with the above scale to determine your present grade. For example, suppose that just after the midterm you have 75 points. Since S =90, we have that P = (200 * 75)/90, which is about 166, a middle B.

Please, don’t ask me how you are doing; just do the calculation and find out for yourself. Take charge.

**Academic policies**

Cheating of any kind will result in substantial point loss at my discretion
depending on the severity of the transgression.
Serious cases will be reported to the Dean. (This means BIG trouble).

Students are responsible for knowing what has been said in class, including announcements.

Chatting or texting are strongly discouraged and strictly forbidden if, in my judgment, they disturb me or other students. More generally, civil behavior is expected at all times. At my discretion, you may be required to leave the class and will lose 5% of the course grade for every breach of the above rules.

**A piece of advice**.

As much of the material covered
involves learning skills, actively doing the in-class exercises is
essential. If in spite of your efforts
you are having difficulties*, come and see
me as soon as possible*. Although RA
101 is a 100 level course, many students find it difficult; hence, if you want
a good grade, you need to spend enough time studying. How much is enough time? It depends, as some need to work more than
others. However, a good estimate is one
and a half the number of class hours.