Probability Density and Quantum Mechanics

4.2 Schrödinger’s Wave Function

Consider a particle moving along the x-axis.  Quantum mechanics determines the probability of observing the particle in a given position at a given time by using the wave function  of the particle.  One gets  by solving the Time Dependent Schrödinger Equation (TDSE),

                                               (4.2.1)

where V is the (classical) potential energy determined by the physical system under investigation, m the mass of the particle, and  (h-bar) is Plank’s constant. [1]  In other words, the wave function is a solution of TDSE.  Setting up TDSE and solving it can be (and often is) difficult.  However, all we need to know is that the relationship between the wave function, probability, and physical reality is given by Born’s statistical interpretation:, the normalized squared modulus (the square of the absolute value) of the wave function, is the probability density that upon observation the particle will be found at point x at time t.  For example, suppose that at time ,  is the curve in figure 4.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 4

Then, the area under  between a and b is the probability that a position measurement at time t1 will return a value between a and b.  The key word here is “measurement”.  That is, at least in the minimalist version we consider, quantum mechanics makes predictions only about measurement returns.  In other words, all it tells us is what returns we shall have, and with what probability, if we perform such and such an experiment, without making any claims about quantum particles outside of the experimental setting.

4.3 The Harmonic Oscillator

Consider a cube on a frictionless plane attached to a spring fixed to a wall.  Suppose that the system is in an equilibrium position, corresponding to the relaxed length of the spring so that the box is at rest (Fig. 5).  Let us take the origin 0 of the x-coordinate to be the position where the center of box is.  Now, we stretch the spring to the right so that the center of the box is at  and then we let go.  Obviously, the box will be pulled back by the spring, acquire energy which will be spent compressing the spring until its center reaches .  Then, it will be pushed again by the compressed spring to the position it had when we let the box go.  In short, in the absence of friction or external forces the box will forever oscillate back and forth between x1 and x2 with simple harmonic motion.  Such a system is a harmonic oscillator. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 5

 

The probability density for the classical harmonic oscillator is plotted below (Fig. 6).

Text Box: Ps
 

 


Text Box: xText Box:  x1Text Box:   x2

Text Box: 0
 


Figure 6

 

x1 and x2 are called “turning points” because the center of the box cannot go beyond them: doing so would be contrary to the laws of classical (Newtonian) mechanics.  The plot tells us that if we take random snapshots of the box, the bulk of the snapshots will depict the box near the turning points.  On reflection, this is how we would intuitively think it should be, since the box moves the slowest close to the turning points and the fastest close to point 0 in the middle of the run.

            However, when we consider the quantum harmonic oscillator, we are in for some big surprises.   First we need to plug the (classical) potential energy formula  (where k is a constant measuring the springiness of the spring and x is the spring’s displacement) for the harmonic oscillator into TDSE.  Once we have solved TDSE and obtained the wave function, we need to normalize its square modulus.  Although this is too complex for us to tackle, amazingly it turns out that the mathematics of normalization forces the quantization of energy.  While the classical harmonic oscillator can have any energy level (between any two energy levels, one can always find a third), the quantum harmonic oscillator can only be found to have discrete and very definite energy levels E0, E1, E2,….  In addition, while in the classical case the lowest energy level is zero (corresponding to the state in which the spring is relaxed and the box does not move), in the quantum case the measurement return for lowest possible energy (the energy of what is called “the ground state”) is

,                                                                                                      (4.3.1)

a quantity greater than zero, albeit a very small one.[2]  The measurement returns of all the other possible energy levels (the energies of the excited states) are multiples of E0 according to the formula

.                                                                                             (4.3.2)                          When it comes to position measurements, things are as strange, as we can gather from figure 7, which provides the plots of the probability densities for the first four energy levels.  (The intersection points between each probability density and the parabola at an energy level are the classical turning points for that energy level).          

 x

 

E0

 

E1

 

 E2

 
Text Box:  E3

|Y(x)|2

 

Figure 7

 

In an excited state En, there are n positions in the space between the turning points where the particle will never be found.  In particular, in all odd states such as E1 or E3 the probability of finding the particle exactly in-between the turning points is zero.  In addition, the probability of finding the particle outside the classically permitted range (beyond the turning points) is not zero, a phenomenon called “tunneling”.  In fact, it turns out that the lower the energy, the greater the probability that the particle will tunnel: at the ground level, the probability of tunneling is slightly above 15%.  Tunneling is a pervasive phenomenon at the quantum level: it allows the sun to burn (and life on earth to exist) and matter to escape from black holes.

 



[1] Actually,  is Plank’s constant divided by .  represents partial differentiation with respect to t and  partial differentiation with respect to x.  Don’t fret: we won’t deal with this.

[2] , where k is a measure of the springiness of the spring, and m is the mass of the cube.  In other words, the stronger the force exercised by the spring, the larger  is, and the larger the mass of the cube, the smaller  is.