Monday, February 03, 2014: Applications are due by 4:30 p.m. to the applicant's Department Chair for evaluation. Chair submits directly to School/College Research Committee.
Monday, February 17, 2014: Applications due by 4:30 p.m. to the School/College Research Committee for Review. Committee submits directly to School/College Dean.
Monday, March 17, 2014: Applications due by 4:30 p.m. to the School/College Dean for preparation of Dean Evaluation
Monday, March 31, 2013: School/College Dean submits proposals and evaluations to Graduate School.
Estimated Announcement Date: May 09, 2014
Project Period: July 1, 2014 – June 30, 2015
Final Report: October 1, 2015
The New Investigator Awards are made to tenure-track SIUE faculty members in order to recognize and support individual programs of research or creative activities. These Awards recognize faculty members whose research or creative activities have the promise of making significant contributions to their fields of study, their respective school/department and to SIUE in general. Recipients are expected to produce published scholarly works/products and externally sponsored grants/contracts.
Eligible applicants must have earned appropriate terminal degrees in their disciplines and have regular full-time tenure track faculty positions at the Assistant Professor level. Eligible junior faculty may apply any time after successful completion of their first year at SIUE and before promotion to Associate Professor. Recipients must be at the Assistant Professor level throughout the duration of their New Investigator award. Previous recipients of the New Investigator Award, or recipients of external awards over $30,000 while at SIUE, are not eligible to apply. All applicants must have submitted completed final reports and fulfilled the terms and conditions, including submission of an external grant proposal, of projects previously funded by the SIUE Graduate School at least 5 business days before this program deadline in order to be eligible for this program.
Up to two Lindsay New Investigator Awards will be made per year. These awards are designed to support a significant and discrete portion of a faculty member's larger research agenda. A cost-share equaling 20% of the total award is required from the applicant’s school/department. Each recipient of the New Investigator award will receive $10,000 from the Graduate School and $2,500 from their unit for a total of $12,500 for a one-year period. Summer funding is not included in this award. Funds may be expended for:
Applicants must have the endorsement of their Department Chair and Dean.
Letters of Evaluation
There are no formal guidelines for creating the Letters of Evaluation from the Dean or Department Chair. The evaluations should address the criteria enumerated below under "Selection Criteria," and provide an honest, overall assessment of the applicant’s scholarly potential and ongoing contribution to the school/department. The evaluation should also include a clear statement from the applicant's school/department outlining its 20% cost-share commitment, preferably indicating the budget line items the unit would like to support. Applicants will NOT receive a copy of the Letters of Evaluation unless provided upon request by the Chairs and Deans.
1. Cover Page and Checklist (Required)
2. Project Summary Page (1 page)
Please include a brief description of your project in a paragraph of no more than 100 words. Content should include the following points:
3. Narrative (10 Pages)
Applications must address the individual's overall agenda for research or creative activity and the proposed work and objectives for the one-year award period. Each application must be supported by a narrative of no more than ten (10) pages (excluding References, Vitae, and Appendices). Pages must be numbered. The Narrative addresses:
The narrative should be written in a manner that is understandable to a non-specialist. The document must be formatted using at least 1.5 line spacing and at least 11-point Times New Roman font or 10-point Ariel font with 1-inch margins.
4. Budget and Budget Justification (2 pages)
You may download a brief budget template to facilitate your budget outline. Please note that the budget justification should be as detailed as possible, explaining the estimated costs for each portion of the project and its necessity for completion of the project. The Budget and Budget Justification are not included in the narrative page limit.
5. References: Include a list of references showing your familiarity with the pertinent literature.
6. CV (2 pages) or COS Pivot Profile (unlimited): Submit a copy of your curriculum vitae or your COS Pivot Profile. Curriculum vitae are limited to two pages. If you choose to submit your Pivot Profile, please ensure that your Profile is up-to-date. Reviewers will use your completed Pivot Expertise Profile instead of a traditional curriculum vitae. This document should include activities most relevant to the proposed project and demonstrate expertise to carry out the proposed work.
7. Appendix: Information may be included in an Appendix if it is necessary to the reviewers’ understanding of the research project and to provide evidence of access to needed resources and people. Such appendices may include but are not limited to: letters of commitment from consultants, sub-contractors and supporting facilities; letters of commitment from foreign contacts and institutions; letters of commitment from library or archive administrators, sample surveys or protocols for human subjects research. Appendixes may not be used to provide data that belongs in the narrative.
8. Letter of Evaluation from Department Chair (to be added by Department Chairs to proposals and submitted directly to the school/college research committee on deadline date)
9. Proposal Critique Form from the School/College Research Committee (to be added by Research Committee Chairs to proposals and submitted directly to the school/college dean on deadline date)
10. Letter of Evaluation from School Dean (to be added by School Deans to proposals and submitted directly to the Graduate School on deadline date)
The Graduate School's RPAB Committee will make its recommendation for the New Investigator Award recipient to the Associate Provost for Research and Graduate Dean. The focus of the selection process will be on identifying the applicant for whom a New Investigator Award could make the most significant contribution in furthering research or creative activities in the applicant's discipline. The RPAB Committee's evaluation will include, but is not limited to, consideration of the following factors:
Research is broadly defined as all creative, critical, scholarly, and/or empirical activity that expands, clarifies, reorganizes, or develops knowledge or artistic perception. This definition of research includes the demonstration, implementation, application, and dissemination of research results and those grants designated as research by the granting agency. This definition of research does not include departmental curriculum development, faculty development (learning an established technique, a language, or a methodology; dissertation research), institutional research (studies related directly to the operation of the University), and public service and consulting activities.
A Final Report is required within ninety (90) days after the completion of the appointment, October 1, 2015. Recipients of the award are expected to produce published scholarly works and externally sponsored grants.
New Investigator Award recipients must submit a grant proposal for external funding by the time of the final report . Eligibility for future internal funding from the Graduate School is dependent upon the fulfillment of these two requirements.
Patience Graybill Condellone
Vaughnie Lindsay New Investigator Awardees
|Dan Welch, Department of Growth, Development and Structure, School of Dental Medicine|
|Georgiann Davis, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice Studies, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Xin Chen, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, School of Engineering|
|Jennifer Gapin, Department of Kinesiology, School of Education|
|Kristine Hildebrandt, Dept. of English Language and Literature, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Jason (Jake) Williams, Dept. of Biological Sciences, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Edward Navarre, Dept. of Chemistry, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Jason Stacy, Dept of Historical Studies, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Kevin Rowland, Department of Applied Dental Medicine, School of Dental Medicine|
|Joseph Schober, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy|
|Guim Kown, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy|
|Lucian Stone, Department of Philosophy, College of Arts & Sciences|
|Vaughnie Lindsay Research Professor Awards|
|2006 - 2007
|Louise Flick, Department of Family and Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing|
|Leah O'Brien, Department of Chemistry, College of Arts & Sciences|
|2004 - 2006
|Margaret (Peg) Simons, Department of Philosophy, College of Arts & Sciences|